In 1 John 5:6 John uses water and blood as symbolic short hand, clearly expecting his audience to know the meaning of these two liquids.
6 This is the one who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ. He did not
come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who
testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. 7 For there are three that
testify: 8 the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are
in agreement. 9 We accept human testimony, but God’s testimony is
greater because it is the testimony of God, which he has given about
his Son.
At its most basic 1 John 5:6 operates as a counter claim to those who hold that Jesus Christ came in water but not in blood. John holds that Jesus Christ came by both water and blood. A counter group appears to believe He came only in water. The structure of this verse as an implicit rebuttal begs the question of what does it refute. What is the meaning of water and blood?
Varnel Watson
John Ruffle The conclusion…
Varnel Watson
Ricky Grimsley I believe you are dead wrong on this one. Is Perry condoning OR prophetically exposing the deep state 9 of {gray} government areas? I believe he is prophetically exposing it just like Branham did a century ago http://www.pentecostaltheology.com/the-1933-william-branham-woman-president-prophecy/
Ricky Grimsley
You don’t have to be a prophet to know about the deep state. Branham was nutty
Varnel Watson
Perry did you know…
Robert Erwine
Deep state? Please explain,.
Varnel Watson
Robert Erwine Deep state 9 is Ricky Grimsley conspiracy theory that all prophecy preachers are sanctioned by the White House to preach peace prosperity
Varnel Watson
Robert Erwine as you may noticed Perry is looking directly at the Mercy seat located under the Dome nowadays Not sure how Terry Wiles missed it upon his last visit to Jerusalem