The Art of Spiritual Warfare Part 2: The Strategy of the Saints

The Art of Spiritual Warfare Part 2: The Strategy of the Saints

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected

| PentecostalTheology.com

               

The Art of Spiritual Warfare: Part 2: The Strategy of the Saints

The Strategy is an Offensive One

“… and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.” Matthew 16:18

  • Our job is not to sit back and wait, it is to look for opportunities to advance the Kingdom of God
  • The Advance
  • Gates cannot attack
  • The implication is that you will “storm” the gates and they will not stand against you
  • This is an offensive strategy

Never attack when you will have no chance of victory

Sometimes attack when you have a chance of victory

Always attack when you are guaranteed a victory

The Art of War states that “to win 100 victories in 100 battles is not the pinnacle of skill.  To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence.”

  • The cause of Christ is right. However, the “right” will not be accepted if it is not demonstrated in love.
  • Also, fighting many battles will wear you out. Choose your battles!

How do we know when we are guaranteed victory?

Four points in which victory may be predicted

From The Art of War

  1. He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious.
  2. He who understands how to fight in accordance with the strength of antagonistic forces will be victorious.
  3. He whose ranks are united in purpose will be victorious.
  4. He who is well prepared and lies in wait for an enemy who is not well prepared will be victorious.
  • When To Fight
    1. Do not try to do battle before you are ready
    2. The Holy Bible, King James Version
      2 Timothy 2:15
      15Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
  • How To Fight
    1. You must understand the strength of the enemy as well as the strength of your God
    2. The Holy Bible, King James Version
      Romans 12:3
      3For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith.
  • Why To Fight
    1. We must be united in purpose.
      1. To lift up the Name of the Lord
    2. The Holy Bible, King James Version

Matthew 12:25
25And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

  • Prepared To Fight
    1. The enemy knows your weaknesses, so when you come to the enemy in the power of God, your weaknesses are gone and the enemy will not be prepared for it.
    2. The Holy Bible, King James Version
      Matthew 17:21
      21Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

9 Comments

  • Reply April 23, 2019

    Varnel Watson

    part 2 just for Charles Page If you dont fight the battle someone else wins

    • Reply April 23, 2019

      Charles Page

      I used to be confused about spiritual warfare and it is true that someone else wins.

      Now I believe in active spiritual warfare and I am always victorious, I don’t know defeat. I have excellent intelligence to act upon.

    • Reply April 24, 2019

      Varnel Watson

      you either fight it or it fights you

    • Reply April 24, 2019

      Isara Mo

      Troy Day
      No middle way

  • Reply September 8, 2019

    RichardAnna Boyce

    Jesus’ parables are teaching how GOD will advance HIS Kingdom at HIS pace and timing. Pentecostals try to use the parables to persuade God to agree to their church growth projects.

  • Reply May 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    //2 Timothy 2:15
    15Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.//
    No. nobody understands the source words about that verse. What was timothy to study? Whats the word of truth?

  • Reply May 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    its a lot of supposition that circles around a false idea that angels could ever sin or even, want to sin, or that angels would think of sin or consider fleshly desires like pride for example, or that God allowed angels (who are always before His face!!!!!<<<) to.......
    Media: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10218804412179967&set=p.10218804412179967&type=3

  • Reply May 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    Pentecostal teaching on spiritual warfare lacks sound biblical exegesis.

  • Reply May 16, 2023

    Anonymous

    If you think as Charismatic being the second wave in 50-70s who came from mainline denominations – maybe, but if you go back to Wagner is very much Charismatic

    As already mentioned to Gary Micheal New Apostolic Reformation originates directly from C. Peter Wagner (1930-2016) who took the idea from G12 while in South America and coined the term in 1994 after trying several alternatives such as “Neopentecostal,” “Neocharismatic,” “Independent,” “Post denominational” or “Nondenominational.” and Third-wave” (also a term coined by Wagner)

    There are several factors here
    1. After stating 1 thing in his Secular City, in Fire from Heaven Harvey Cox expounded on South America exploding for the Gospel while North American churches – in the city – slowly dying

    2. Wagner @ Fuller and AG were all seeking an answer for church growth and they found it in
    1) charismatic renewal in N America
    2) S American revivalism in the 1980s – I think particularly Brazil, though Wagner was in a different area but borrowed a lot from G12 and also Cox, who as a thinker nailed the Pentecostal growth idea

    3rd wave IMO was not only Wagner’s term. It was used naturally after the Charismatics and Yes it was more Charismatic theology as most of South American Pentecostals came running straight from the Catholic churches “Independent” and “Post denominational” were also not his terms but he tried them well. “Neopentecostal” and “Neocharismatic” he used both almost interchangeably But the term that stuck was NAR Wagner subsequently wrote of NAR in his books:
    The New Apostolic Churches (1998);
    Churchquake! (1999);
    Apostles and Prophets (2000);
    Changing Church (2004);
    and Apostles Today (2006).

    Now back to Toronto airport revival – there is IMO no other place in hte 90s where NAR was more prominent. Terry Wiles may correct me of course but Toronto had every facet of NAR present within them. This IMO characterizes their theology strictly Charismatic all the way to the time when Wagner (and others) made the curve to post-Trib and in some cases even to post-Mil also borrowed from the very Catholic theology of Augustine spread in S America and in some point even into the Liberation Gospel and Rushdoony’s Christian reconstructionism

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.