Should Philippians 2:6 say "in the form of God" or "in the form of a god"?

Should Philippians 2:6 say "in the form of God" or "in the form of a god"?

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected

| PentecostalTheology.com

               

I have come across a theological assertion that Philippians 2:6 should be understood thus:

Who, being in the form of a god, thought it not robbery to be
equal with a god

What is the hermeneutical justification for adding or not adding the ‘a’ or for understanding an ‘a’ even if it is left out of the translation?

Be first to comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.