Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected
| PentecostalTheology.com
Paul warned of false doctrines, yet also said doctrine is important. He warms the flock to steer away from these falsehoods, but also said our fight is against these principalities.
You must do what you are called to do. I cannot sit by while false teachers lead innocents to their death. Truly they’re those who’ve had their throats cut in the name of falsehood, yet they believed it to be true.
Think about them…😭 It hurts me so much to see it continue. If you don’t obey the John 3 formula for being born again, you cannot enter the kingdom of God, right?
Jesus came to fulfill the mosaic law not abolish it, and you weren’t clean until you gave testimony of your cleansing to the priest. Then you were clean. So too you have to be baptised of water and of spirit to be declared clean, it’s not just the Roman Road.
Confessing Jesus as Lord, and believing God raised him from the dead will save you. But so too before a Israelite came to be declared clean, he must already be clean, right? Yet if the priest does not declare him clean, his cleansing is in vain.
You must be baptised in Jesus name to receive the holy ghost as a testimony to your salvation. For we are baptised unto Jesus’s death so that we might be resurrected with HIM. Without this testimony, our high priest, Jesus Christ, will not declare us clean.
There are many who will say, “Lord, Lord,” but Jesus will tell them HE never knew them. Answer me this, is it worth taking the risk that Jesus will tell you to depart? You’ve already confessed and believed, just go the extra step and be baptised in Jesus name. If our faith is in vain, then we all still lose. Please take heed. You’ve already repented, now there’s one last step. Please be baptised in Jesus name, brothers and sisters! I love you all so much! In Jesus name. Amen.
Guest;
in Jesus ONLY name? Joe Absher Terry Wiles
Guest;
What false doctrine are you talking about?
Guest;
Modalistic monarchianism is not false. It’s Peters rock. If you’d like we could have a friendly debate about it.
Guest;
oneness brothers need to take a deep breath , its all good we agree its all about Jesus . He is God !
Guest;
I’m here to show a new way. It’s not oneness Pentecostal. It’s modalistic monarchianism. Sure there are three that bear witness, but putting God into a box of three modes is not right. He is a living God that has unlimited modes. One monarch, unlimited possibilities.
Guest;
For example, in what image are we made? Since “‘ĕlôhîym” is the plural form of “‘ĕlôahh ‘ĕlôahh” reason stands that there is more than one image in context.
Guest;
Genesis 1:26
[26]And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Guest;
A colon is used to introduce an elaboration or explaination of words used before it. So the colon after the phrase, “after our likeness” is used with the intention of explaining that likeness. Dominion or “râdâh” is likeness being explained in Genesis 1:26.
Guest;
A semicolon can be used between two closely related independent clauses, provided they are not already joined by a coordinating conjunction. Semicolons can also be used in place of commas to separate items in a list, particularly when the elements of that list contain commas.
Guest;
Genesis 1:27
[27]So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Guest;
In a similar fashion the semicolon used is to connect the first two clauses with the final conclusion since the comma already provides a coordinating conjunction.
Guest;
Therefore we may conclude that the images of Genesis 1:27 are indeed male and female and the Trinitarian exegesis of this passage is refuted.
Guest;
My apologies for being so blunt.
Guest;
Good list of posts on oneness However they do NOT tell us noting new MOST of the arguments were well reproofed by our AG some 100 years ago and declared heretical I dont see any NEW evidence from what has been said in these discussions At least not Biblical evidence that deserves any deeper discussion in the group
Guest;
I understand. I only seek truth so if you could at least provide the link it would allow me to deepen my studies. Thank you for allowing me into your group. I haven’t found anything yet that refutes my exeges of this passage.
Guest;
Your Biblical arguments are of interest of course, as long as you can present and defend them before this group
Guest;
I’ll be gentle on language. And receptive to criticism as that is how I’ve learned so much as it is. I look forward to friendly debates. Thank you Troy Day and and do love you brother. God bless
Guest;
Why wouldnt you be gentle on language?
Guest;
I would. Just stating it. I’ve been in debates where people get mad and call me d head, wolf, and all sorts of foul language. In my opinion when someone stops to that level they’ve lost the debate so i never stoop. I only state my personal rules because they’re no posted rules.
Guest;
we have only gentle on language discussions here
Guest;
That’s what i prefer. Nobody’s learning anything when people become overzealous. It drives people away