Evidence for/against Romans chapter 16 being a later addition to the text?

Evidence for/against Romans chapter 16 being a later addition to the text?

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected

| PentecostalTheology.com

               

There are those who suggest that chapter 16 is a later addition to an originally shorter epistle to the Romans.

It strikes me that arguments against the originality of Romans 16 based upon what we do/don’t know about the individuals mentioned therein are arguments that beg the question they are supposed to be answering; I also am unaware of any manuscript evidence for this theory (but please point out any if I’ve missed it!).

The end of chapter 15 is a somewhat fitting concluding thought though–should this be understood to be the conclusion?

That I may come unto you with joy by the will of God, and may with you
be refreshed. Now the God of peace be with you all. Amen. (Romans
15:32-33)

There follows the commendation of Phoebe, numerous greetings, some
final counsel, and:

To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ
for ever. Amen. (Romans 16:27)

Questions

  • What evidence suggests Romans 16:27 was the original ending?
  • Why do some claim that 16:27 is not the original ending?

Be first to comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.